Web3 wallet & dApp testing
EDELLENCE provides Web3 wallet testing and dApp testing services across onboarding, backup and recovery, session pairing, signing, chain switching, RPC behaviour and asynchronous transaction states.
Focused on evidence your product and engineering teams can use.
Why Web3 quality is different
A successful click is not a successful transaction. The user may be connected to the wrong account, approve a stale request, switch chains mid-session or remain stuck while callbacks and on-chain state disagree.
Our Web3 quality engineering follows state across the complete journey. We work with non-custodial and custodial models, mobile and browser-based wallets, dApp sessions, multi-chain assets and the automation needed to make complex failure paths repeatable.
Service scope
Coverage is designed around irreversible actions, asynchronous dependencies and recovery paths—not only happy-path confirmation.
Protect the lifecycle users rely on before they can connect or transact.
Validate the relationship between dApp intent, wallet session and the final signing path.
Exercise chain-specific conditions and the external infrastructure behind transaction progress.
Build repeatable evidence across UI, API, events, databases and concurrency boundaries.
Wallet, dApp, backend, RPC provider and chain state may disagree, leaving unclear ownership and incomplete recovery.
Teams gain repeatable coverage for the states where asset movement, user trust and external infrastructure meet.
How the engagement works
We adapt the depth and sequence to your product, team and release pressure while keeping priorities and decisions visible.
We map users, accounts, chains, sessions, signing paths, services and finality into explicit testable states.
We focus on recovery, authorisation, irreversible actions, external dependencies and failure propagation.
We combine mobile or browser automation with API, event, database and network-aware assertions.
We test retries, duplicates, parallel requests, stale state and recovery rather than validating only successful transactions.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. We adapt the risk model to who controls key material and where signing occurs. Non-custodial recovery and local signing need different assertions from platform-coordinated custody and remote transaction state.
It can include pairing, approvals, account and chain changes, session expiry, signing requests, rejection paths, transaction submission and the user experience when wallet, dApp and network state diverge.
Yes. Stable contract and API checks, controlled wallet journeys and selected network scenarios can run automatically. We separate deterministic CI evidence from tests that depend on variable external network conditions.
No. Our focus is product quality, integration behaviour and transaction workflows. We can validate contract interactions and failure handling, but specialist code-level security auditing is a separate discipline.
Bring the difficult state
Tell us where session, signing or transaction state becomes difficult to trust. We will map the workflow and design the right quality evidence.